Crypt0's NewsCrypt0's News

Gaming

Epic Bragged About Seconds, Steam Answered in Hours, and the Engine War Got Loud

Epic Games pushed a rebuilt Epic Games Launcher into Preview on October 14, 2026, claiming it opens 46 percent faster than Steam from a cold start, a test Valve effectively answered with a Steam client patch bringing its own startup near 5.23 seconds, while Epic chief Tim Sweeney declared an AI first production pivot, Bloomberg's Jason Schreier said the next Unreal Engine will push AI workflows onto studios across the industry, and Capcom drew a hard line between AI development tooling and game assets made with AI after a week of fan backlash.

This week the storefront war turned into a stopwatch contest, and the stopwatch is a distraction from the real contest. The seconds matter less than what sits underneath them. Epic just shipped the highest profile software ever built primarily with AI assisted coding, and the same company now plans to push AI workflows into the engine most of the industry builds on. The launcher race is marketing; the engine pipeline is destiny.

The numbers first. Epic says contractor Keywords Studios tested the new launcher across 13 machines, five runs each, excluding the three lowest end machines, and found a cold start to the store page averaging 5.47 seconds against 10.07 seconds for Steam, a 46 percent advantage. Tray restore to the library came in at 0.36 seconds against Steam's 0.42, a 14 percent edge that Tom's Hardware notes amounts to 0.06 seconds in absolute terms. Against its own previous client, Epic claims library loads 30 times faster and startup twice as fast, with vice president Martin Keely putting his name on those figures. The rebuild ships as a Preview that runs alongside the existing launcher rather than replacing it, on Windows 10 and 11 and macOS 12 or newer, and for the first time includes a native Linux client, which The Verge flagged as consequential for SteamOS and other Linux gaming setups. Epic's own framing is unusually blunt. AI agents wrote and reviewed much of the code while engineers supervised, making this the most prominent AI built storefront client in the industry.

Valve's answer arrived fast and the timeline is deliciously ambiguous. IG News reported October 15 that a Steam update had brought cold start times down to about 5.23 seconds, beating Epic's 5.47 and adding a Big Art Mode for the home screen, a personal calendar on the Recommended tab, and a Big Picture screensaver. TalkEsport, meanwhile, notes Valve's patch notes carry an October 13 date, a day before Epic's October 14 post, which leaves room for both readings, a rapid competitive reply or a coincidental update that happens to undercut the marketing. Tom's Hardware cautions against relying on the Preview for competitive or mission critical use. Either way, Valve let the benchmark fight itself while Epic supplied the benchmarks, and Steam came out ahead on its own terms.

The bigger story is what Sweeney said earlier in the week. Epic is transitioning toward AI first production, using AI driven technology to streamline every part of game development. Bloomberg journalist Jason Schreier's read is the one traveling fastest through the industry. It reaches past Epic's output into Unreal Engine, which so many studios use. The next major iteration, Unreal Engine 6 or whatever the naming becomes, will carry AI based development tools deep into its pipeline, reshaping how countless studios build their games. The criticism arrived quickly, centered on creative integrity and job security after a year of industry layoffs.

Capcom spent the week learning the other side of the same argument. At its October 2 developer conference for the RE Engine, the company unveiled plans to evolve its proprietary RE Engine, the technology behind Resident Evil, Street Fighter 6, and Monster Hunter, into what it calls an AI generation game engine. The announcement, made through its REX initiative, ignited a firestorm on Bluesky, where players connected it to monetization controversies and threatened boycotts. Capcom clarified that the goal is AI support for coding and testing rather than game assets made with AI, drawing the line the industry is currently fighting over, AI as development tooling on one side and AI made art, writing, and voice inside the shipped game on the other. Fans remain skeptical that the boundary holds.

For the player, the takeaway is refreshingly practical. Storefront speed is measured in seconds and decided by lab benchmarks, and both companies now start in about five. The durable questions are who writes the tools, who owns the assets, and where the line sits between assistance and replacement. This week players got unusually honest answers from both sides, and the answers are worth watching longer than the benchmark charts.

Quick answers

What is this story about?

Epic Games pushed a rebuilt Epic Games Launcher into Preview on October 14, 2026, claiming it opens 46 percent faster than Steam from a cold start, a test Valve effectively answered with a Steam client patch bringing its own startup near 5.23 seconds, while Epic chief Tim Sweeney declared an AI first production pivot, Bloomberg's Jason Schreier said the next Unreal Engine will push AI workflows onto studios across the industry, and Capcom drew a hard line between AI development tooling and game assets made with AI after a week of fan backlash.

Why does this story matter?

For the player, the takeaway is refreshingly practical. Storefront speed is measured in seconds and decided by lab benchmarks, and both companies now start in about five. The durable questions are who writes the tools, who owns the assets, and where the line sits between assistance and replacement. This week players got unusually honest answers from both sides, and the answers are worth watching longer than the benchmark charts.

Sources

New to crypto? Read the crypto glossary, browse frequent questions, read our story, or explore the story archive.

← Back to Crypt0's News